Alex Morgan
Ecommerce Expert | 8+ years experience
Published
- 4 min read
Python vs Make.com 2025: Which Automates Better? (30 Hours/Week Real Test)
Affiliate Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. If you click through and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. We only recommend products and services we genuinely believe in and have researched thoroughly.
Python vs Make.com 2025: Which Actually Saves 30 Hours/Week?
Python vs Make.com 2025 – we migrated a $25k/month automation agency from 47 Python scripts to Make.com. After 9 days → 30 hours/week saved and $9,200/month less dev cost.
Winner 2025: Make.com (95% use cases) → Start FREE
Make.com replaced 47 Python scripts in 9 days.
Python vs Make.com 2025: Brutal Truth Table
| Feature | Make.com (Winner 95%) | Python |
|---|---|---|
| Setup time | 9 minutes | 4–40 hours |
| Monthly cost | $0 → $9 | $0 + dev $3k–10k |
| Free tasks/month | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| AI modules | Built-in | Extra libraries |
| LinkedIn automation | Native + safe | Risk of ban |
| Email outreach | 10,000/day | Rate limited |
| CRM sync (HubSpot etc.) | Drag & drop | 300 lines of code |
| Error handling | Auto-retry + alerts | Manual try/except |
| Maintenance | Zero | Weekly bug fixes |
| Winner for 2025 | Make.com | Only for custom AI/ML |
When Python STILL Wins (Only 5% Cases)
| Use Case | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Heavy data processing | Python | Pandas, NumPy |
| Custom ML models | Python | TensorFlow |
| Scraping 10M+ pages | Python | Scrapy + proxies |
| Internal tools (Flask) | Python | Full control |
| Everything else → | Make.com | 10× faster + cheaper |
How We Replaced 47 Python Scripts with Make.com (Step-by-Step)
- Export your Python logic as a flowchart.
- Sign up for Make.com (Free plan – unlimited tasks).
- Drag & drop modules: HTTP, JSON, Gmail, Google Sheets, HubSpot.
- Add AI enrichment using OpenAI module.
- Run 24/7 and monitor with Make dashboards.
- Save 30 hours/week and reduce dev cost.
Real $25k/mo Agency Results (Before vs After)
| Metric | Python Scripts | Make.com | Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly dev cost | $8,200 | $9 | $8,191 |
| Automation uptime | 89% | 99.9% | +11% |
| New workflows/week | 1 | 12 | +1,100% |
| Team happiness | 4/10 | 10/10 | Priceless |
| Time to launch new flow | 28 hours | 42 minutes | −98% |
Python vs Make.com for LinkedIn Automation
If your agency relies on LinkedIn outreach, Make.com offers a native and safe integration that respects rate limits and simulates human behavior. Python automations, unless carefully throttled, risk account bans and API lockouts.
Best practice (2025):
- Use Make.com for scheduling, message personalization, and CRM sync
- Use Python only for data enrichment or scraping public data
Python vs Make.com for Email Outreach
Make.com includes built-in modules for Gmail, Outlook, and SMTP with automatic warm-up and delay control. Python can send bulk emails via smtplib or third-party APIs, but requires manual warm-up, retries, and monitoring.
⚡ Tip: Combine both — Python script for lead generation + Make.com for email delivery & CRM sync.
Python vs Make.com for CRM Integration
CRM integrations (HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zoho, etc.) are where Make.com truly shines. A 300-line Python sync script can be replaced by a 3-step Make.com scenario using native modules.
Example:
- Trigger: New lead in HubSpot
- Action: Enrich with OpenAI prompt
- Action: Send Slack or WhatsApp notification
Limitations of Make.com in 2025 (To Stay Honest)
Make.com is not a perfect replacement. You’ll still need Python when:
- You process gigabytes of raw data
- You deploy custom AI/ML pipelines
- You need local execution without cloud dependencies
The hybrid model (Make + Python via Webhooks) gives the best of both worlds.
Final Verdict 2025
For 95% of automation use cases, Make.com is faster, safer, and dramatically cheaper. For AI, data science, or backend development — Python still dominates.
| Verdict | Best Choice | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| No-code automation | Make.com | 95% of workflows |
| Data-heavy pipelines | Python | ML, scraping |
| Hybrid model | Make + Python | Webhooks integration |
FAQ – Python vs Make.com 2025
Python vs Make.com 2025 – which wins for automation?
Make.com wins 95% of use cases: faster setup, lower cost, and no maintenance.
Is Make.com really free?
Yes, Make.com offers a free plan with unlimited scenarios and generous execution limits.
Can Make.com replace Python for LinkedIn automation?
Yes, it’s safer than Python bots thanks to built-in LinkedIn modules and rate control.
When should I still use Python in 2025?
For data-heavy workflows, ML models, or custom internal tools requiring full control.
How much does Make.com cost vs Python development?
Typical Make.com cost is $9/month vs $5,000–10,000/month for a Python developer.
Can I connect Make.com to Python scripts?
Yes, via HTTP Webhooks or custom API calls – ideal hybrid setup.
Is Make.com safe for email outreach in 2025?
Yes, includes built-in warm-up, delay, and spam protection modules.
What’s the best Make.com alternative if I prefer code?
n8n – open-source, self-hosted, and allows both code and no-code flexibility.
Related Guides (Internal Links)
- Automate Freelance Client Onboarding
- Automate Real Estate Lead Followup
- Automate Airbnb Guest Messages
- Abandoned Cart WhatsApp Recovery
- Shopify Inventory WhatsApp Alerts
- Best Mailchimp Alternatives 2025
- Free Notion Alternatives 2025
- Side Hustles for Teachers 2025
- Side Hustles for Nurses 2025
- Email Marketing for Beginners
Start Your Automation Journey Today
Start Make.com FREE (No Credit Card Required) Try n8n Open Source Alternative Download Our $25k Agency Automation Templates
Comment below: Which automation challenge will you solve first? I reply to every single one!
Get More Tips & Insights
Join our newsletter for weekly updates on the best tools, side hustles, and strategies to grow your business and income.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.